Letters to the Editor - Why a marriage amendment - Why a marriage amendment?

Recently readers have seen a flurry of letters in local papers arguing for and against the proposed marriage amendment to the Minnesota constitution. As for me, I have lots of questions about “resolving” such social issues at a constitutional level.

Who should define marriage and its absolute parameters — state law or religion or free individuals? The Roman Catholic Church has determined for almost 2,000 years that marriage is a sacrament. Sacraments are usually not available outside the defining religion. What then about the rest of our citizens and residents of Minnesota, and this Camden area? Is marriage to be available to non-Catholics here, or are we defining two different kinds of marriage, the one civil and the other religious?

A clergy person, for example, must gain permission from a county office before solemnizing marriages in the state where that county is located. This setup indicates a dual role. The clergy is performing a function for both the state and his or her church group by performing the marriage ceremony.

What is the State of Minnesota’s interest in marriage? Usually what is vital to the state is the protection, health and wellbeing of its citizens and residents. Related laws are passed to reduce the spread of diseases, to regulate the ownership of property. Ever-changing benefits to the married and unmarried need constant adjustment for fairness and equality.

Is the big issue for marriage found only in one single issue, procreation? It’s nothing new today for two or more siblings to live out their lives together.  It’s common that a couple of friends will make similar arrangements. Should the state constitution be amended to regulate all this once and for all?

John Bispala,

Webber-Camden